Content Quality & AI Signals Checker
Review writing patterns that can make content feel generated, repetitive or overly templated. The checker highlights signals for human review rather than claiming to prove who wrote the text.
Check your content
Paste the content below. Analysis runs locally in your browser, so the text is not sent to Vital SEO or an external AI service.
—
What deserves human review
Important: This checker identifies writing patterns only. It cannot determine with certainty whether text was written by a human or generated by AI. A low or high signal level is not evidence of authorship.
Look for useful content, not an AI percentage
AI-detection percentages can imply a level of certainty that writing analysis cannot reliably provide. This tool instead looks for characteristics such as repetitive phrasing, unusually uniform sentence lengths, generic transitions and limited specificity.
Use the result as an editorial prompt. Content can show several of these patterns and still be entirely human-written, while generated text can be heavily edited and show very few of them.
What the checker looks at
The browser-based analysis considers sentence-length variation, repeated phrases, common templated transitions, numbers and concrete details, first-person or experience-oriented language, and vocabulary repetition. These are indicators for review rather than proof of origin.
Help us keep improving the Content Quality & AI Signals Checker
Found the Content Quality & AI Signals Checker useful? Give it a ★.
Your stars help us understand which free tools people value most. We use this feedback to decide which tools to maintain, improve and develop further.
You can support a tool once per visit, and every star contributes to its ongoing total.
Thanks for your input — it helps us focus our time on the tools that are most useful to you.
Star this tool